Potatoes make EWG’s ‘dirty dozen’ list, AFF issues counter report
Since 1995, an activist group has released a “dirty dozen” produce list. Peer-reviewed studies show this list’s findings are not scientifically supportable.
While the EWG’s list is based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Pesticide Data Program, that same program found that 99 percent of products sampled were well within EPA safety levels.
This year, potatoes made the list at No. 12. Strawberries topped the list, followed by spinach and kale.
In an attempt to provide a balanced picture of pesticides used on produce, the Alliance for Food and Farming issued the following statement.
AFF release
Since 1995, an activist group has released a so-called “dirty dozen” produce list. However, peer-reviewed studies show this list’s recommendations are not scientifically supportable while other studies show it may negatively impact consumers since it discourages purchasing of any produce — organic or conventional.
“For example, the AFF has a webpage at safefruitsandveggies.com with lots of positive information for consumers about organics,” she added. “And it is time to stop calling non-organic forms of healthy fruits and veggies ‘dirty’ and perpetuating unfounded safety fears that may negatively impact consumers’ purchasing of both organic and conventional produce.”
Some key studies about produce safety and nutrition include:
- A study specifically examined the risk/benefit of consuming a diet rich in conventionally grown produce and pesticide residue exposure. That study determined that if half of all Americans increased their consumption of a fruit and vegetable by a single serving each day, 20,000 cancer cases could be prevented each year. The study authors concluded that the overwhelming difference between benefit and risk estimates provides confidence that consumers should not be concerned about cancer risks from consuming conventionally grown fruits and vegetables.
- Peer reviewed research has shown that the author’s “dirty dozen” list recommendation to substitute organic forms of produce for conventional forms did not result in a decrease in consumer risk, because residues are so low on conventionally grown produce, if present at all.
- The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pesticide Data Program (PDP) and the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) residue sampling program both found that more than 99 percent of the produce sampled had residues far below Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) safety levels, if present at all. The USDA stated in their report summary: “Based on the PDP data, consumers can feel confident about eating a diet that is rich in fresh fruits and vegetables.”
- An analysis conducted by toxicologists with the University of California’s Personal Chemical Exposure Program found a child could eat hundreds to thousands of servings of a fruit or vegetable in a day and still not have any health effects from residues. For kale, a woman could eat 18,615 servings in a day and a child could consume 7,446 servings.
For consumers who may still be concerned about residues, the FDA says washing your produce under running tap water often removes or eliminates any residues on organic and conventionally grown produce that may be present.
To learn more about the safety of all fruits and vegetables visit safefruitsandveggies.com.