Column: Farmers shouldn’t face more taxes to pay for added federal spending
That quote popularly attributed to former Senator Everett Dirksen, who served in Congress from 1933 to 1969, almost seems quaint in this current age where a single federal program can now easily surpass the trillion-dollar threshold.
As the country continues to recover from the pandemic, Congress and the Biden administration are actively debating the type and size of additional relief that the United States requires. A key consideration in determining the size of those packages is how to pay for them, and tax increases have been suggested for at least some of those bills. Unfortunately, some decision makers have put tax increases for family farms in their crosshairs as they seek “reforms.”
For example, the Sensible Taxation and Equity Promotion Act (STEP Act) — introduced by Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) — proposes to eliminate stepped-up basis upon death of the owner. Another bill, the For the 99.5 Percent Act (S.994) — introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) — would decrease the estate tax exemption to $3.5 million ($7 million per couple), among other things, with the goal to “end our rigged tax code and ensure the wealthiest people and largest corporations pay their fair share.” While it might be targeted toward the wealthiest 0.5%, farmers with even modest estates would likely end up paying substantially more if this act is passed.
A third proposal, this one by the Biden administration, would require farms and ranches to shoulder the burden to pay for their $1.8 trillion American Families Plan. The proposal would mainly be paid for through changes to the tax code. Those changes, including increasing capital gains tax rates, increasing taxes on appreciated assets, and limiting the use of like-kind exchanges, would significantly burden family farms.
The National Potato Council (NPC) is pushing back on these proposals along with other allied agricultural organizations. We are backed in these efforts by key Congressional leaders who sit on the House and Senate Agriculture Committees.
“The data speaks for itself and should give pause to anyone considering this approach as an option to pay for new additional federal spending. If changes of these magnitude are pursued, as some have discussed, the economic harm it will cause will have a lasting impact on rural America,” said Senator Boozman.
The report validates the concerns the NPC and other agriculture organizations have raised with House and Senate leadership. In letters and conversations with members of Congress, NPC has argued that farms, still reeling from the pandemic’s continued impact on their businesses, should not be on the hook to pay for additional federal spending.
NPC opposes any and all proposals that would eliminate or undermine tax provisions necessary to protect family farms from being broken up or shut down. Repealing stepped-up basis and imposing a second death tax would have far-reaching negative impacts on family-owned businesses, their employees, and all those depending on them to deliver food to their dinner tables.
Now is not the time to impose additional burdens on those working every day to keep Americans fed, and the NPC will continue to fight for family farms in order to keep the tax man at bay.